Kenyan politics has been recently abuzz following remarks by Kericho Senator Aaron Cheruiyot, who accused Kiharu MP Ndindi Nyoro of allegedly redirecting funds originally meant to pay teachers toward subsidizing school fees in his constituency. The claims emerged after Nyoro implemented a landmark initiative to reduce school fees under a programme called Masomo Bora, which has attracted national attention for its potential impact on education affordability in Kiharu. (peopledaily.digital
)
While the issue has sparked debate, it is important to note that as of now, there is no independent verification that funds were misused — the allegations remain political in nature.
Ndindi Nyoro and the Masomo Bora Initiative
Ndindi Nyoro, the MP for Kiharu Constituency, has long been known for innovative constituency projects aimed at supporting education, youth empowerment, and local development. The Masomo Bora programme, launched in late 2025, focuses on:
Reducing secondary school fees for day schools to Ksh 500 per term, benefiting over 12,000 learners. (thetimes.co.ke
)
Providing meals during school days, which helps alleviate the burden on families struggling with rising living costs. (nairobileo.co.ke
)
Allocating funds for learning materials, classroom infrastructure, and overall school support through the National Government Constituency Development Fund (NG‑CDF).
The programme has been praised by many parents and educators for making education more accessible, especially in rural areas where school fees are a major barrier.
Aaron Cheruiyot’s Allegation
Despite the praise, Senator Aaron Cheruiyot raised concerns that funds intended to support teachers’ salaries are being redirected to pay for the reduced school fees. Cheruiyot argued that:
In constituencies where some teachers are on NG‑CDF contracts, local funds are normally used to supplement salaries.
By cutting fees for students, Nyoro is allegedly using these funds to cover the shortfall created by the subsidy.
This could potentially affect teachers’ welfare and the sustainability of locally funded salaries. (peopledaily.digital
)
Cheruiyot’s statement was made in a media interview on January 13, 2026, and it has since sparked political debate over education funding, MP discretion, and the role of NG‑CDF in supporting school infrastructure and teachers.
Understanding NG‑CDF and Education Funding in Kenya
The National Government Constituency Development Fund (NG‑CDF) is intended to support local development projects, including education, health, and infrastructure. In schools, NG‑CDF funds can be used for:
Infrastructure projects like classrooms, desks, and toilets
Learning materials for students
Supplementary salaries for teachers not employed by the Teacher Service Commission (TSC)
School operational support, such as extracurricular activities
Importantly, the majority of teachers in Kenya are paid directly by TSC, meaning MPs generally do not control salaries. In constituencies with teachers on PTA or NG‑CDF contracts, MPs have some discretion over salary supplements. (kenyanews.go.ke
)
The Debate: Supporters vs Critics
Supporters of Nyoro argue that:
The Masomo Bora initiative is a creative solution to make education affordable.
Redirecting NG‑CDF funds toward school fees, when legally permissible, does not harm teacher salaries.
The programme has boosted enrollment and attendance, benefiting children from low-income families.
Critics, led by Cheruiyot, contend that:
Reducing fees using public funds could jeopardize funds meant for teachers’ welfare.
There is a risk that over time, financial mismanagement or unsustainable subsidies could emerge if similar initiatives continue without proper oversight.
The conversation has triggered wider discussions about MP discretion in education funding, the balance between fee reduction and teacher welfare, and accountability in NG‑CDF allocations.
Political Implications
Cheruiyot’s remarks reflect broader political tensions between MPs and across parties regarding constituency development projects. Key implications include:
Scrutiny of MP-led initiatives – other MPs may face increased scrutiny regarding fund allocation.
Debate over school fees and accessibility – the discussion spotlights the growing national concern for affordable education.
Media attention on education policy – the controversy may prompt calls for more transparent auditing of NG‑CDF usage and monitoring of locally managed schools.
This controversy illustrates the complex intersection of politics, development, and education in Kenya.
Neutral Analysis
While Cheruiyot’s claim has sparked debate, it’s important to recognize:
No formal audit or TSC investigation has confirmed misuse of funds.
Nyoro’s initiative aligns with constituency development goals, aiming to improve access to education.
MPs have discretion within NG‑CDF guidelines, which can legally include fee support or school operational funding.
In other words, the allegations are political commentary, not an established fact or judicial ruling.
Conclusion
The recent comments by Senator Aaron Cheruiyot accusing Ndindi Nyoro of diverting teacher salary funds to subsidize school fees have ignited a lively debate over fund management, MP discretion, and education accessibility in Kenya.
Ndindi Nyoro’s Masomo Bora programme, which reduces secondary school fees to Ksh 500 per term, provides tangible benefits to students and families in Kiharu. While critics worry about the implications for teacher salaries, the initiative has improved enrollment, attendance, and overall student support
