The Interview That Changed the Race
While the national spotlight was on the 2026 political shifts, a different kind of drama was unfolding at the Milimani Law Courts. On Wednesday, April 29, 2026, Justice Mohamed Warsame sat before the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) and delivered what many legal analysts are calling a “flawless” performance.
Unlike other candidates who appeared uneasy under the panel’s gaze—notably Justice Katwa Kigen, who was pressed on his past legal ties to President William Ruto—Warsame leaned into his reputation as an intellectually fierce and independent jurist.
The Philosophy: Judicial Review vs. Merits
During a particularly intense line of questioning, Justice Warsame clarified a common misconception about the role of the courts. He argued that Judicial Review is not about determining “guilt or innocence,” but about ensuring that the process of law was followed correctly.
“The court is the guardian of the process. If the process is flawed, the outcome cannot stand, regardless of who is involved,” Warsame stated.
This firm grasp of procedural justice is exactly what the Supreme Court needs as it prepares for the high-stakes constitutional petitions expected in the 2027 election cycle.
The “Case Crusher” Reputation
One of the most impressive statistics shared during the interview was Warsame’s record on the bench.
-
7,000 Petty Offenders: As Chairman of the Community Service and Probation Committee, Warsame oversaw the release of over 7,000 petty offenders to decongest prisons.
-
Case Clearance: He holds one of the highest clearance rates in the Court of Appeal, often arriving in court at 8:00 AM to ensure that “justice delayed is justice denied” remains a slogan of the past, not a reality of his courtroom.
A Jurist of the Year
This isn’t Warsame’s first time in the winner’s circle. In 2011, he was named Jurist of the Year by the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) Kenya Chapter. His nomination to the Supreme Court is seen by many as the natural culmination of a career spent protecting the Bill of Rights and streamlining the Commercial and Judicial Review divisions.
Addressing the “Establishment” Question
Warsame was also grilled on his long-standing role within the JSC itself, having represented the Court of Appeal for two terms. Critics asked if he was too much of an “insider.” His response was characteristic: he argued that his experience within the commission gives him a unique “360-degree view” of the challenges facing the Judiciary, making him ready to hit the ground running from Day One.
The Verdict
By picking Justice Warsame, the JSC has chosen substance over optics. He brings a rare mix of administrative experience, lightning-fast case management, and a deep, scholarly understanding of the Constitution. For the Supreme Court, his arrival means the “bench of seven” is back to full strength, led by one of the most respected minds in the Kenyan legal landscape.
Do you think Justice Warsame’s “speedy justice” approach will help clear the Supreme Court’s backlog? Or is he too much of a judicial “insider”? Let us know in the comments!
